Back
RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
Ikram Siddiqui – Appellant
Versus
B. G. Omkaramurthy – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This revision petition is filed by the accused under Sec. 397 read with 401 of Cr.P.C., challenging the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dtd. 2/9/2013 passed by the II Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Shivamogga in CC No.244/2009 and confirmed by the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Shivamogga, in Criminal Appeal No.224/2013 vide judgment dtd. 27/8/2014.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred with original ranks occupied by them before the trial Court.
3. The brief factual matrix leading to the case are as under:-
The complainant and accused jointly entered into a Memorandum of Understanding on 11/7/2007 and they have agreed to contribute equally towards consideration of the purchase of property. Accordingly, they have entered into an agreement and accused agreed to pay Rs.01.00 Crore 80 Lakhs and the complainant had agreed to Rs.20.00 Lakhs and over all Rs.43.00 Crore payable. In the balance amount of Rs.43.00 Crore payable, the accused had agreed to pay Rs.20.00 Crore and Rs.70.00 Lakhs and the complainant had agreed to pay Rs.22.00 Crore and 30 Lakhs. Then, the complainant and accused have jointly entered into Memorandum of Und
The issuance of cheques in relation to a settlement deed constitutes a legally enforceable debt under the Negotiable Instruments Act, and the presumption of such debt remains unless effectively rebut....
A mediation settlement can modify sentencing outcomes while confirming a conviction under negotiable instruments law.
[The judgment establishes that cheques issued in discharge of a liability are enforceable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and the proper service of statutory notice is crucial fo....
Criminal Law - Dishonoured of Cheque - Appeal against conviction - Petitioner in this case, did not raise any probable defence which would create doubts in mind of Court. Court find no reason to inte....
A cheque issued for a debt that is barred by the law of limitation cannot be enforced under Sec. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and the presumption of a legally enforceable debt under Sec. 13....
The court confirmed that presumption under Sections 118 and 139 of the N.I. Act applies, shifting the burden of proof to the accused in a cheque dishonor case, with concurrent findings of fact upheld....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
