Back
H. P. SANDESH
Padma T. L – Appellant
Versus
Sarojamma – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This matter is listed for admission. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant.
2. This appeal is filed challenging the judgment and decree dtd. 28/6/2017 passed in R.A.No.21/2015 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Tumakuru.
3. The factual matrix of the case of the plaintiff before the Trial Court is that her father T K Laxmana @ T K Laxmanappa died in the year 2007 leaving behind the plaintiff and defendant Nos.2 to 13 as sole successors. It is also contended that the said T K Laxmana got released from his joint family by executing the release deed dtd. 22/12/1949. It is contended that her father commenced petty engineering work at Garden road, Tumkur. Due to joint efforts and hard labour of the plaintiff and defendant Nos.3, 8, 12, T L Parthasarathy, deceased T L Anandha Babu, T K Laxmana @ Laxmanappa established the industry under the name and style "Jaya Laxmi Industries and Engineering Work" at Garden Road, Tumkur. Out of the income derived from the industries, her father purchased item Nos.1 and 2 in the suit 'A' schedule in his name under the sale deed dtd. 29/7/1962 and item Nos.1 to 21 of 'B' schedule are also purchased by her father out of
The judgment establishes that in claims for partition of joint family properties, the burden of proof rests on the claimant to demonstrate the existence of joint ownership, and the principles of res ....
The burden of proof in establishing joint family nucleus and self-acquisition of properties lies with the plaintiff and defendants respectively. The due execution of a Will can be established through....
The court reaffirmed the principles governing the grant of temporary injunctions, emphasizing the need for a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and the potential for irreparable harm in disput....
The plaintiff must prove the existence of a joint family nucleus to establish claims over joint family properties; mere relation does not imply entitlement.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that properties acquired from individual earnings of family members cannot be treated as joint family properties unless deliberate abandonment and ....
The presumption of joint family status in Hindu law requires clear evidence to establish prior partition; the Appellate Court allowed partition of one property acquired post-partition while dismissin....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
