Back
H. P. SANDESH
V. Narayanaswamy – Appellant
Versus
M. V. Sriramareddy – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. This revision petition is filed under Sec. 115 of C.P.C. praying this Court to set aside the order dtd. 5/12/2022 rejecting I.A.No.9 filed under Order 12, Rule 6 of C.P.C. and consequently, dismiss the suit in O.S.No.138/2014 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Chintamani.
3. The factual matrix of the case of the plaintiff before the Trial Court is that the plaintiff and first defendant are the brothers and sons of Kotalani Venkataraya Reddy and Smt. Seethamma. It is contended that, after the death of father of the plaintiff and the first defendant, they have succeeded the joint family and ancestral properties and jointly cultivating the said lands. The plaintiff was working as an Assistant Teacher in the Education Department and his earnings had contributed the joint family and developed and purchased properties in the name of kartha, who is the first defendant herein, by contributing joint family funds. It is also the contention of the plaintiff that the plaintiff, first defendant and their mother Smt. Seethamma have purchased the property in the name of the first defen
The discretionary nature of the power under Order XII Rule 6, the need for clear and unambiguous admissions, and the discretion of the court in delivering a quick judgment on admission.
Admissions in pleadings or related documents allow for expedited judgments under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, affirming that clear and unequivocal admissions can preclude the need for further evidence.
(1) Judgment on admission – For exercise of discretion by Court under Order XII Rule 6 of CPC, admission must be unequivocal – No particular form of admission is necessary – Judgment on admission is ....
The court emphasized the need for clear admissions and the appropriate use of discretion under Order XII Rule 6, ruling that judgments on admissions must be based on unequivocal facts, necessitating ....
Order 7, Rule 14 of C.P.C. which provides for production of document.
Courts must reject a plaint under Order VII Rule 11 if it discloses no cause of action or is barred by limitation. This power must be used to terminate vexatious litigation where 'clever drafting' at....
The court held that a partition suit is not maintainable without proper evidence of ownership, especially when the property has been sold in execution proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
