Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA, J
Smt. Savitri Joshi – Appellant
Versus
Rameshwar Yagnik @ Lall Saheb – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the parties and prior suits (Para 2 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments regarding the maintainability and legal standing of the suit (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 22) |
| 3. court's reliance on documentary evidence over oral evidence (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. judgment on admissions under order xii rule 6 of cpc (Para 34 , 52) |
| 5. conclusion of appeal with remand instructions to trial court (Para 56 , 57 , 60) |
C.A.V. JUDGMENT
Date : 04-12-2025
1. Heard Learned counsel for both the parties.
2. The instant First Appeal has been preferred by the appellants against the judgment dated 28.04.2014 and decree dated 23.05.2014 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge IV, Bettiah in Title Suit No. 72 of 2010 wherein the learned Trial Court disposed of the suit on admission and decreed in terms of pronouncement of compromise decree of Partition Suit No. 159 of 1949 and permanently restrained the appellants (defendants) to interfere in peaceful possession of respondents (plaintiffs) over the suit land.
3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are being referred to as defendants-appellants or plaintiffs-respondents.
4. To understand the relationship between the parties to the suit is shown
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
