KRISHNA S.DIXIT
H. \N. Pruthivinarayan – Appellant
Versus
Managing Director, Ksrtc – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Petitioner, claiming to be an ongoing contractor, is tapping the writ jurisdiction of this Court for assailing the Notification dtd. 10/1/2023 issued by the 2nd respondent at Annexure-G calling for e-Tender inter alia in respect of commercial complexes in the KSRTC bus stand at Hassan. The habendum of the said tender in colloquial reads as under:

2. Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the Petitioner seeks to falter the tender in question on the ground of force majeure namely COVID-19 Pandemic; the two Central Government Notifications dtd. 19/2/2020 and 13/5/2020 have the effect of elongating the twelve year contract period pro tanto; there is lapse on the part of respondents in discharging certain contractual obligations briefly stated in para 5 of the petition, despite representations; Petitioner had filed a few cases such as W.P.No.30258/2018, C.M.P No.233/2018, W.P.No.8992/2021, W.P.No.16705/2022 (respondents W.A.No.27/2023); bifurcation of subject matter of tender is unsustainable; impugned action defeats legitimate expectation; Petitioner has got right of extension of the contract; there being an ongoing arbitration, without its culmination into an award, the impu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.