Back
M. NAGAPRASANNA
Abhay Kumar, S/O Jagat Bhupendra Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
ORDER :
The petitioner is before this court calling in question proceedings in C.C.No.24483 of 2018 arising out of crime in Crime No.112 of 2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 498A, 420 read with 34 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ for short).
2. The facts, in brief, germane are as follows:
The 2nd respondent is the complainant, wife of the petitioner. The two get married on 21-04-2014. Soon thereafter, the allegation or averment in the petition is that, the complainant started to quarrel with the petitioner/husband and therefore, the relationship began to flounder. After floundering of the relationship, the wife institutes several proceedings – one invoking Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, the other is petition for restitution of conjugal rights in M.C.No.2536 of 2015 and the third one is the impugned proceedings for it being registered on 30-05-2018 for the afore-quoted offences. Thereafter, the husband institutes proceedings before the concerned Court seeking dissolution of marriage.
3. The Police, in the subject crime, conduct investigation and file a charge sheet in C.C.No.24483
The court established that allegations of cruelty and dowry demands must be substantiated by evidence; otherwise, proceedings may be quashed to prevent abuse of the legal process.
Allegations under Section 498A must meet specific legal thresholds; trivial irritations do not constitute cruelty, and misuse of legal provisions in matrimonial disputes is subject to quashing.
(1) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 – Sections 85 and 86 – Matrimonial cruelty – Section 86 is nothing but verbatim reproduction of Section 498A of IPC – Legislature requested to look into the issue ta....
Vague and general allegations in dowry harassment cases do not constitute a prima facie case, necessitating specific allegations to prevent misuse of legal provisions.
General and omnibus allegations in matrimonial disputes do not justify criminal prosecution against relatives of the husband without specific evidence.
Cruelty and dowry offences – Criminal law must not be permitted to degenerate into instrument of oppression or personal vengeance.
Section 498A of IPC reads as husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty.
General and unsupported allegations in matrimonial disputes cannot sustain criminal charges against relatives; specific acts must be demonstrated to justify prosecution.
Proceedings under Section 498-A IPC quashed due to vague allegations deemed retaliatory in a matrimonial dispute, emphasizing the need for substantial evidence to uphold such claims and prevent abuse....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
