SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Kar) 490

E. S. INDIRESH
Ningappa Shankrappa Hachdad – Appellant
Versus
Neelamma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. D.P. Ambekar.
For the Respondents: Mr. Sanganabasava B. Patil.

JUDGMENT :

(E.S. Indiresh, J.)

This appeal is filed by the plaintiff challenging the judgment and decree dated 03rd December, 2019 passed in Regular Appeal No.23 of 2010 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Basavana Bagewadi (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'First Appellate Court'), dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment and decree dated 05th April, 2010 passed in Original Suit No.09 of 2000 on the file of the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.), Basavana Bagewadi (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'Trial Court'), wherein the suit filed by the plaintiff came to the dismissed.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties in this appeal shall be referred to in terms of their status and ranking before the Trial Court.

3. The plaint averments are that the plaintiff claims to be the owner of the suit schedule property, alleging that the defendants 2 and 3 are the son and daughter of defendant No.1. The defendant No.1 is the daughter of the deceased Shankaramma and the suit schedule property belongs to said Shankaramma. It is stated in the plaint that the deceased Shankaramma died on 16th October, 1976 leaving behind the registered Will dated 23rd July, 1976 bequeathing t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top