Back
HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
Shanthamma @ Shanthi W/o. Late Javarayappa – Appellant
Versus
Anusuya W/o. Giri – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Hanchate Sanjeevkumar, J.
This appeal is filed by defendant Nos.1 to 3 challenging the judgment and decree dated 10.01.2022 passed in RA.No.92/2016 by the Court of III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hassan, thereby the judgment and decree dated 12.01.2016 passed in O.S.No.9/2015 by the Court of the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Holenarasipura came to be set-aside and the matter was remanded to the trial Court for fresh consideration.
2. Parties shall be referred to as per their status before the trial Court.
3. The plaintiff has filed a suit for partition and separate possession claiming her 1/12th share and mesne profits in respect of the suit schedule properties by contending that the suit schedule properties are the joint family and ancestral properties. Defendant Nos.1 to 3 entered appearance and defendant No.2 filed written statement. During the pendency of the suit, defendant Nos.1 to 4 have filed an application under Section 11 of CPC praying for rejection of plaint. The grounds urged for rejection of plaint is that the suit filed by the plaintiff is hit by res judicata, as the prayers sought in this suit are similar to the one in O.S.No.34/1991 between the fa
Res judicata requires a full trial to establish; dismissing a suit based solely on pleadings without evidence is incorrect.
The right to seek partition is inherent and continuous for co-owners; prior dismissal of a partition suit does not bar subsequent suits, provided the parties are different.
The principle of res judicata bars litigation on matters already adjudicated, and can be decided as a preliminary issue when sufficient materials exist.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the plea of res judicata requires consideration of the pleadings, issues, and decision in the previous suit, which is beyond the scope of Orde....
The court held that the doctrine of res judicata precludes the maintainability of a subsequent suit on the same issues already adjudicated in a prior case.
The principle of res judicata bars a subsequent suit on the same matter once a decree has been conclusively decided, even if it was ex parte.
The court confirmed the status of joint family properties, ruling prior partition claims insufficiently proven, which allowed plaintiffs' partition suit to proceed despite earlier suit dismissal on n....
The principle of res judicata is inapplicable when the earlier suit is still pending, and distinct causes of action exist between the suits.
Withdrawn partition suits do not preclude subsequent partition actions; res-judicata is not applicable where the first suit was not decided on merits.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
