Back
B. M. SHYAM PRASAD
Myntra Designs Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
National Faceless Assessment Centre – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petitioner claims refund under the it act. (Para 1) |
| 2. legal requirement for withholding refunds necessitates recording reasons. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 3. court mandates compliance with legal standards for refund disbursement. (Para 8 , 10) |
ORDER :
1. The petitioner has filed this petition for directions to the Respondents to issue refund of Rs.9,30,46,736/- as computed under Refund Intimation dated 22.09.2022 bearing DIN: CPC/2122/A6/243697378 (Annexure A) along with applicable interest under section 244A of the INCOME TAX ACT , 1961 (for short, 'the IT Act') in an expeditious and timely manner. Sri. Tarun Gulati, the learned Senior counsel for the petitioner, and Sri. Y.V.Raviraj, the learned Senior standing counsel for the respondents, are heard.
2. The petitioner, for the Assessment Year 2021-22 is informed about the computed refund in a sum of Rs.31,94,20,940/- (including the principal amount in a sum of Rs.29,35,11,360/-), and this computation is as of 22.09.2022. On 16.05.2023, the third respondent (the jurisdictional Additional Commissioner of Income Tax), referring to the withholding of refund to the petitioner for the Assessment Year 2021-2022, has informed the
Authorities must provide cogent reasons for withholding tax refunds, with mere pending assessments not sufficient justification under the Income Tax Act.
The main legal point established is that the withholding of a refund under Section 241A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 requires detailed and compelling reasons to be recorded in writing, and the exercis....
The court highlighted the conditions under which the Revenue can withhold the refund and emphasized the need for the Revenue to balance the interests of both the assessee and the Revenue in cases whe....
Once a refund is quantified under Section 143(1), the Revenue must release it unless a valid order under Section 241A is issued; mere issuance of a scrutiny notice does not suffice.
Point of law: the law declared by the highest court in the State is binding on authorities or Tribunals under its superintendence, and that they cannot ignore it either in initiating proceeding or de....
The estimation of tax liability should be rational and founded on cogent grounds, taking into account the financial wherewithal of the assessee and consistent application of accounting policy.
Tax refunds must comply with legal protocols, and any readjustment without notice lacks justification under tax law.
The court emphasized that refunds under the Income Tax Act must be processed within specified timelines, and any lack of proper credit must not hinder the petitioner's entitlement to refunds.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
