SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 1366

B. M. SHYAM PRASAD
Tinton River Palms – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: K.M. Shivayogi Swamy
For the Respondent: Hema Kumar K.

ORDER :

1. The petitioner has impugned the audit report dated 31.12.2013 under Section 65[6] of the KARNATAKA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT , 2017/Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [for short, 'KGST/CGST Act'] as per Annexure-E, and for consequential direction to the third respondent to re-adjudicate after extending a reasonable opportunity in terms of Show Cause Notice dated 09.12.2022 [Annexure-D] issued under Section 65[5] of the KGST/CGST Act. Sri. K M Shivayogiswamy, the learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri. K Hemakumar, the learned Additional Government Advocate, who accepts notice for the respondents, are heard for final disposal in view of the narrow canvass of the petitioner's grievance.

2. Sri K M Shivayogiswamy submits that the petitioner is extended with opportunity to file books of accounts and the last of the endorsement in that regard is issued on 13.10.2022. The third respondent has issued Notice under Section 65[5] of the KGST/CGST Act on 09.12.2022 and this Notice is received by the petitioner only on 23.12.2022. The third respondent, within seven days there from without reasonable opportunity, has passed the impugned Audit report.

3. Sri K Hemakumar, the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top