SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 116

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
Lalitha Kanneganti
P. Suresh, S/O K.Pitchai Muthu – Appellant
Versus
Deepa, W/O P.Suresh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sri. Reny Sebastian, Advocate

ORDER :

Lalitha Kanneganti, J.

Aggrieved by the order passed in I.A.No.XI in M.C.No.4823/2017 dated 23.11.2024 by the I Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru, whereby the Family Court had rejected I.A.No.XI filed under Order VI Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure, the petitioner/husband is before this Court.

2. The parties are referred to as husband and wife for the sake of convenience.

3. The husband had filed M.C.No.4823/2017 seeking divorce on the ground of cruelty as well as desertion. In the petition that is filed before the Family Court, it is stated that the cause of action arose on 26.01.2001 when the marriage between the petitioner/husband and respondent/wife got solemnized and thereafter, again during the year 2007 when the wife left the husband in October, 2010. The M.C. is filed in the year 2017. During the Course of trial, the present I.A. came to be filed under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC. Now, by way of this amendment, the husband wants to amend the cause of action as when the respondent left the petitioner in October 2005 and subsequently on 27.04.2012 when the petitioner was acquitted from the case in S.C.No.884/2010 filed by the respondent and on subsequent d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top