SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 151

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU 
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J.
Sri Naganna, S/o. Chikkachannegowda and Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Karnataka, Department Of Co-Operative, Rep By Its Principal Secretary and Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 8434 of 2025 (CS-EL/M)
Decided On : 03-07-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Sri. Puttaraju H.B., Adv.
For the Respondents: Sri. Yogesh D. Naik., AGA, Sri. T.L. Kiran Kumar., Adv., Sri. Vinaya H., Adv., Sri. H.N. Basavaraju., Adv.

Eligibility disputes in society elections must be raised post-election and under specified provisions of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, not through Article 226.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - Dispute regarding eligibility of voters in society elections - Petitioners' prior decision on casting votes allowed with conditions; eligibility disputes to be resolved post-election under Section 70(2) - Jurisdiction of writ not upheld for electoral irregularities. (Paras 1-2)

(B) Election disputes - Categorical conclusion that eligibility matters should be raised after election results are announced and under specific procedural provisions of cooperative legislation when interrelated matters permit. (Paras 2-3)

(C) Legal principle regarding the finality of prior judgments in similar matters affirmed. (Para 3)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners were previously declared ineligible to vote but were allowed to cast votes in society elections under specific conditions pending the outcome of this writ petition. The decision referenced an earlier ruling that established processes for addressing eligibility concerns.

Findings of Court:
Writ Petition disposed of, directing results announcement within seven days considering the votes including those of petitioners.

Issues: The main issue was whether the eligibility dispute could be addressed within the ambit of the current writ petition.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that disputes regarding electoral irregularities are to be addressed through specific statutory procedures post-election results and should not be considered under Article 226.

Result: Writ Petition disposed of.

Table of Content
1. petitioners allowed to vote subject to result (Para 1)
2. irregularities addressed under specific law after results (Para 2 , 3)
3. order for election result announcement and open contentions (Para 4)

ORDER :

(SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J.)

1. This Court by way of various interim orders had permitted the petitioners who were declared to be ineligible voters to cast their vote in the elections of the Society, subject to the result of the writ petition and that the votes cast by the petitioners shall be kept in separate ballot boxes.

2. A Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of H.S.Raju vs. State of Karnataka & others, [W.P.No.8502/2022 dated 7.6.2022] has after considering the matter in detail come to a categorical conclusion that any irregularity in the conduct of election a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India would not be the proper remedy any dispute as regards the eligibility or ineligibility and the deficiencies in finalization of final electoral list, could only be considered in a dispute raised as regard the election under Section 70 (2) of the KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT , 1959 after the announcement of the results by counting even the votes cast by the petitioners.

3. The said judgment not having been challenged and having attained finality, the fact being more or less similar would equally apply to the present matter.

4. In that view of the matter, I pass the following:

ORDER

i. The Writ Petition is disposed of

ii. The Returning Officer is directed to announce the result within seven days of the receipt of a copy of this order by taking into account the votes cast by the petitioners in the above matter.

iii. In the event of any proceeding being filed in relation to the results of the election under Section 70 (2) of the KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT , 1959 , all the contentions raised herein and any that may be raised are left open for consideration in accordance with the applicable law, this court has not expressed any opinion on those issues.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top