IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M. NAGAPRASANNA
Vikas M. Dev, S/o. Late Mr. M.C. Mahadeva – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Police, Office Of The Commissioner Of Police Infantry Road, Bengaluru – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. medical negligence involving patient care. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments on medical negligence and procedural failures. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. guidelines on prosecuting medical negligence cases. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. consent and its significance in medical procedures. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. court's emphasis on dignity and accountability in medical negligence. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. final order to register fir and conduct investigation. (Para 20) |
ORDER :
(M. NAGAPRASANNA, J. )
The petitioner, bereaved and aggrieved, approaches this Court invoking its writ jurisdiction, seeking justice for a lamentable demise – the untimely death of his father, allegedly occasioned by medical negligence. In furtherance whereof, seeks the following prayer :
“A. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction directing the respondents herein to conduct a preliminary enquiry into the complaints dated 18.06.2024 and 26-06-2024 preferred before the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 by the petitioner (Annexures ‘A1’ to ‘A3’) and thereby call for a medical report/ opinion from an independent expert body/authority as to the commission of medical negligence as detained in the said complaints,
JACOB MATHEW v. STATE OF PUNJAB
MARTIN F.D’SOUZA v. MOHD. ISHFAQ
SAMIRA KOHLI v. DR. PRABHA MANCHANDA
NIZAM’S INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES v. PRASANTH S. DHANANKA
Medical professionals must adhere strictly to consent protocols; deviations constitute negligence, justifying FIR registrations.
Medical negligence requires substantial expert evidence to warrant prosecution; mere allegations without solid proof are insufficient.
Medical professionals cannot be prosecuted for negligence unless there is gross negligence established through expert opinion; mere errors or lack of consent do not suffice.
Criminal proceedings against doctor quashed absent gross negligence proof and where inquiry report confirms no involvement in treatment; high threshold per established guidelines required for medical....
Criminal negligence in medical cases requires a higher degree of negligence than civil liability; sufficient prima facie evidence can justify prosecution without expert testimony.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.