Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
T.M. NADAF, J, S.G.PANDIT
B Krishnappa, S/o Late Muni Kullaappa – Appellant
Versus
Narayan Reddy @ Narayanappa Since Dead By His Lrs Sri N Srinivasa Reddy – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of land tenancy and occupation rights (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments regarding notice and delay in filing (Para 7 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. court emphasizes need for fair hearing and proper procedure. (Para 8) |
| 4. court's reasoning for remanding the matter (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. final dismissal of the appeal (Para 18) |
JUDGMENT :
T.M.NADAF, J.
This intra-court appeal filed under Section-4 of the Karnataka High Court Act 1961, by the appellants/respondent Nos.4, 6(b) to (d) calling in question the order dated 04.04.2022, passed by the Learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.23035/2011, whereby the writ petition filed questioning the order dated 31.03.1999, passed by the Land Tribunal, Bengaluru south Taluk in LRF(B)DS:241:79-80 and LRF(B)DS:430:76-77, so far as it relates to the lands which are claimed by the petitioners therein allowed remanding the matter for a denovo enquiry.
2. The parties shall be referred to as per their ranking before the learned Single Judge for easy reference.
3. Brief facts leading to filing of this appeal is as under:
As per the petitioners/respondent nos.1 to 9 herein: the petitioners/respondent nos.1 to 9 are the tenants in
The court emphasized the fundamental principle of natural justice requiring notice and opportunity to be heard before a decision affecting rights is made, leading to remand of the case for fresh cons....
(1) Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 is a beneficent legislation for granting occupancy rights to cultivating tenants of agricultural lands.(2) Order of remand cannot be passed as a matter of course ....
The evidentiary value of the Civil Court's judgment, the presumptive value of revenue records, and the limited scope of interference in a revision petition under Sec. 121-A of the Act were the centra....
The court upheld the principles of acquiescence and waiver, ruling that a prolonged failure to challenge a legal order extinguishes the right to contest it, especially after earlier claims have been ....
The court reaffirmed that corrections for clerical errors in land grants are permissible under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, ensuring all parties have the right to present their claims.
The court emphasized the importance of timely action in legal proceedings, ruling that significant delays undermine claims of being unheard and warrant dismissal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
