Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
RAVI V. HOSMANI
R.V. Ganesha Bhatta, S/O Late Venkataramana Bhatta – Appellant
Versus
State Bank Of Mysore – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishment of easement claim by plaintiff. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. defendant's contentions and counterarguments to plaintiff's claims. (Para 8 , 9 , 15 , 16 , 18) |
| 3. issues framed by trial court for resolution. (Para 10 , 12) |
| 4. trial court's findings on evidence and issues framed. (Para 14 , 25 , 26) |
| 5. legal principles concerning easements and findings of law. (Para 21 , 22 , 27) |
| 6. conclusions derived from the assessment of evidence. (Para 24 , 28 , 31 , 46) |
| 7. appellate court's review of trial court findings and evidence. (Para 29 , 30 , 32) |
| 8. requirements for establishing easement by prescription. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 9. final dismissal of the appeal with costs. (Para 47) |
JUDGMENT :
RAVI V. HOSMANI, J.
Challenging judgment and decree dated 03.06.2014 passed by I Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Chikkamagaluru, in RA no.108/2012 and judgment and decree dated 16.8.2012 passed by Civil Judge and JMFC, Shringeri, in OS no.27/2007, this appeal is filed.
2. Brief facts are, appellant was plaintiff in OS no.27/2007 filed for declaration that he has easement by way of prescription for receiving air and light from schedule 'B' property without interruption; directing d
The court affirmed that claims for easement by prescription require clear evidence of uninterrupted enjoyment for 30 years and that different causes of action can support distinct suits without invok....
Easementary rights must be evidenced by uninterrupted and peaceable enjoyment for twenty years, as per Section 15 of the Indian Easements Act, to be enforceable.
First appellate court's perverse denial of pathway existence and prescriptive easement set aside; trial decree restored on unimpeachable commissioners' reports, witness evidence proving 50+ years' op....
Easementary rights must be substantiated by clear evidence of continuous use, and title documents play a crucial role in determining such rights.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for specific pleadings and categorical evidence to establish the right of easement by prescription, as well as the essential ingred....
A claim of easement by prescription can prevail without the need for establishing easement by necessity, if supported by strong evidence.
A plaintiff claiming a right of easement must demonstrate continuous, uninterrupted use for the statutory period to establish the claim, as per the Easements Act, 1882.
Easement by prescription requires proof of continuous use for the statutory period; mere permissive use does not establish a right.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
