SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 902

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J.
 
Parashurama P., S/o. Ramappa – Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Karnataka, (Through Kottur P.S. Vijayanagara), R/By Its State Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Karnataka and Anr. – Respondents
Criminal Petition No. 102895 of 2025 (439(CR.PC)/483(BNSS))
Decided On : 28-08-2025
 

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sri. B. Anwar Basha, Advocate
For the Respondents:Smt. Kirtilata R. Patil, HCGP, Sri. Hanumesh M. Desai, Advocates

The court emphasized that bail should not be denied solely based on serious accusations, especially without substantive evidence of coercion or a criminal history.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Sections 329(4), 78(2), 65(1) - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Regular bail application - Accused arrested under serious allegations pertaining to sexual offences against a minor; application for bail rejected by lower court - Court allows the petitioner's request for bail considering no previous criminal antecedents and the impact of prolonged custody on the petitioner. (Paras 3, 5, 6)

(B) Bail - Criteria for granting bail - Factors include nature of the charges, custody duration, and prior criminal record - The court emphasized that an accused should not be denied bail merely based on serious accusations unless clear offenses are substantiated. (Para 6)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner accused of multiple sexual offenses against a minor, arrested based on victim's account. No prior complaints, and charge sheet filed post-investigation.

Findings of Court:
No evidence of forcible sexual intercourse; petitioner has been in custody for an extended period with no prior criminal history. Grant of bail will not compromise trial integrity.

Issues: Main issues include the reliability of the victim's testimony and whether extended custody justifies bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court maintained that the absence of physical evidence of coercion coupled with the petitioner’s clean record warranted the granting of bail.

Result: Criminal Petition allowed.

ORDER :

S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J.

1. Accused in Spl.C.No.673 of 2025 pending before the Court of Addl. District & Sessions Judge, FTSC-I, Ballari arising out of Crime No.96 of 2025 registered by Kottur P.S., Vijayanagara District for the offences punishable under Sections 329 (4), 78(2), 65(1) of the BNS, 2023 and Sections 4 (2) and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 is before this Court under Section 4 83 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ( BNSS 2023) seeking regular bail.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3. FIR in Crime No.96/2025 was registered by Kottur P.S., Vijayanagara District for the aforesaid offences against the petitioner herein based on the first information dated 27.04.2025 received from the victim girl aged about 15 years 7 months. During the course of investigation, petitioner was arrested on 28.04.2025. After completing investigation, charge sheet has been filed against him for the aforesaid offences. His bail application filed before the Jurisdictional Sessions Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No.673 of 2025 was rejected on 21.06.2025. Therefore, he is before this Court.

4. In the first information which is submitted by the victim girl aged about 15 years 7 months, she has stated that she is acquainted to the petitioner for the last about one year. He was pressuring her to love him and he also had assured to marry her.

5. On 06.04.2025 at about 11:50 p.m. when she and her younger brother were sleeping in the house, the petitioner came inside the house and had sexual intercourse with her against her wishes and promised to marry her. She has further stated that on 16.04.2025 at about 11:30 p.m. when she was returning from a marriage, on the way, the petitioner took her into a dilapidated house and had sexual intercourse with her inside the said house against her wishes. She has further stated that on 26.04.2025 at about 12:00 in the noon when she was alone in the house, the petitioner came inside the house and at the same time her father also came towards the house and after seeing her father, the petitioner ran away. When her father enquired with her, she informed him about the act committed by the petitioner and it is under these circumstances, FIR was registered against the petitioner for the aforesaid offences.

6. The statement of the victim girl under Section 183 of the BNSS , 2023 was recorded by the jurisdictional Magistrate, during the course of investigation. Even in the said statement, the victim girl has reiterated the averments found in the first information. In the medical records of the victim girl and also in the forensic science laboratory report, there is nothing which is suggestive of forcible sexual intercourse by the petitioner, as alleged. The investigation of the case is completed and charge sheet has been filed. The petitioner aged about 23 years, who has no other criminal antecedents is in custody for the last four months. The victim girl had not made any complaint against the petitioner earlier and it is only after her father saw the petitioner with the victim girl, she had allegedly revealed about the act committed by him. Considering the aforesaid aspects of the matter, I am of the view that without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, the prayer made by the petitioner for grant of regular bail needs to be answered affirmatively. Accordingly, the following:

ORDER

The Criminal Petition is allowed. The petitioner – accused No.1 is directed to be enlarged on bail in Spl. C. No.673 of 2025 pending before the Addl. District & Sessions Judge, FTSC-I, Ballari arising out of Crime No.96 of 2025 registered by Kottur P.S., Kottur Circle, Vijayanagara District for the offences punishable under Sections 329 (4), 78(2), 65(1) of the BNS, 2023 and Sections 4 (2) and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 , subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner – accused No.1 shall execute personal bond for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top