SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 955

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM, J.
Vinay @ Vinay Jain, S/o.Kamlesh Kumar - Petitioner 
Versus 
State Of Karnataka - Respondent 
Criminal Petition No. 11578 of 2025
Decided on : 12-09-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:SRI. UDAYA PRAKASH M., ADVOCATE
For the Respondent: SRI. RAHUL RAI, HCGP

The absence of statutory restrictions on the resale of match tickets negates an offence under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 - Section 318(4) - Reselling tickets for Indian Premier League matches - Allegations against the petitioner for selling tickets above face value held unsustainable due to absence of legal restrictions against such resale - Previous ruling by a Co-ordinate Bench noted. (Paras 3, 5, 6)

(B) Criminal Procedure - Abuse of process - Continuation of proceedings without essential ingredients of offence leads to harassment and warrants quashing of FIR. (Paras 7, 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner allegedly resold IPL tickets at inflated prices, leading to police charges under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. A previous case indicated no legal prohibition on ticket resale.

Findings of Court:
The court established that the allegations did not constitute an offence due to the lack of prohibitions on ticket resale, thus allowing the petition.

Issues: The primary issue was the legality of reselling IPL match tickets and whether the prosecution had sufficient grounds under the applicable law.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the absence of specific legal restrictions or prohibitions on reselling match tickets negated the application of Section 318(4), asserting that mere resale cannot constitute an offence.

Result: Criminal petition allowed; FIR quashed.

Judgement Key Points

The legal document pertains to a criminal petition filed to quash an FIR related to the resale of IPL match tickets. The key points are as follows:

  1. The petitioner was accused of reselling IPL tickets at inflated prices, with charges under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (!) .

  2. The court examined whether the resale of tickets constitutes an offence under the relevant law. It was found that there are no statutory restrictions or prohibitions on reselling match tickets, and the tickets are transferable (!) (!) .

  3. The absence of specific legal restrictions on resale means that the act of reselling tickets cannot be deemed an offence under Section 318(4). The law requires that an act fall within its mischief for it to be punishable, which is not the case here (!) .

  4. The court emphasized that continuing criminal proceedings without the essential ingredients of an offence would amount to an abuse of process and cause unnecessary harassment (!) .

  5. Consequently, the court allowed the petition, quashed the FIR against the petitioner, and clarified that in the absence of legal restrictions, reselling valid tickets does not constitute an offence (!) (!) .

  6. The order highlights that the legal framework does not prohibit the resale of transferable tickets, and therefore, such acts cannot be criminalized under the relevant section of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (!) .

These points summarize the court's reasoning and decision to quash the FIR based on the lack of statutory restrictions on ticket resale.


ORDER :

The captioned petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:

a) Quash the entire Chargesheet in C.C.No.23388/2025 pending on the file of 1st Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bangalore, arising out of in Crime No.139/2025 registered by the Yeshwanthpura PS, for the offences punishable under Sections 318 (4) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Annexure-A.

b) Pass such other order as deemed fit in view of the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice.

2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned High Court Government Pleader representing the respondent–State. I have also carefully perused the material available on record.

3. The material placed before this Court discloses that the respondent–Police have initiated criminal proceedings against the petitioner for the alleged offence of reselling tickets for Indian Premier League (IPL) matches at a price higher than their face value, an act said to be punishable under Section 318 (4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

4. A close examination of the complaint and the First Information Report indicates that specific allegations have been levelled against the petitioner to the effect that he was engaged in reselling IPL match tickets for monetary gain, over and above the printed price. On that premise, prosecution has been launched invoking Section 318 (4) of the BNS , 2023.

5. It is pertinent to note that, in an identical fact situation, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, while disposing of Criminal Petition No.7476/2025 by order dated 27.05.2025, has observed as follows:

"1. Learned High Court Government Pleader accepts notice for respondent-State.

2. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

"WHEREFORE, the petitioner prays that this Hon'ble may be pleased to:

i. Quash the F.I.R. initiated by the respondent/Police in FIR No.0215/2025 therein, for the offence punishable under Sec.318(4) of Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pending before the 41st Addl. C.M.M COURT, Nrupatunga Road, Bengaluru, against the petitioner;"

3. The FIR in 215/2025 has been registered by the Bellanduru Police Station on the allegation that the petitioner had purchased tickets for the Indian Premier League to be held in the Chinnaswamy Stadium, Bengaluru for a sum of Rs.1200/- per ticket and sold ten of those tickets to certain others at Rs.6,000/- per ticket and on that basis an offence under Section 318 (4) the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short, 'the BNS , 2023') is alleged against the petitioner.

4. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner had booked the tickets but due to certain unavoidable circumstances could not attend the said match and in that background he sold the tickets, there being no restriction for such sale or resale since the tickets are transferable.

5. In that regard, he relies upon the decision of the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in MANDEEP SINGH Vs. STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER reported in 2015 SCC online P&H 13773 on particularly paragraph-15 thereof which is reproduced hereunder:

"15. In India, there is no legal restriction against reselling match tickets. There is a restriction for transfer of some train tickets but not all of them and are non- transferable. It is not the case here that the tickets were fake. It is not the case of the prosecution that the tickets were not transferable."

6. Relying on Mandeep Singh's case, the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there being no restriction on reselling match tickets there cannot be any offence which could be said to be made out under Section 318 of the BNS , 2023. Section 318 of the BNS , 2023 is reproduced herein for easy reference "318. Cheating-(1) whoever, by deceiving any person, fraudulently or dishonestly induces the person so deceived to deliver any property to any person, or to consent that any person shall retain any property, or intention

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top