IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, C.M.POONACHA
Raju Dundappa Solabannavar @ Soalabanavar – Appellant
Versus
Chandrappa Balappa Solabannavar @ Soalabanavar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
C.M. POONACHA, J.
The present first appeal is filed by defendants No.1 and 2 under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, [Hereinafter referred to as ‘ the CPC’], calling in question the judgment and decree dated 04.11.2019 passed in O.S. No.63/2015 by the Court of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Chikkodi[Hereinafter referred to as ‘the Trial Court’, for short], whereunder the suit for the partition filed by respondents No.1 to 5/plaintiffs has been decreed by the Trial Court.
2. The parties will be referred to as per their rank before the Trial Court, for the sake of convenience.
3. It is the case of the plaintiffs that one Girimalla Ningappa Solabannavar, [Hereinafter referred to as ‘the Propositus’,] died leaving behind his two sons namely Basappa and Balappa who succeeded to the properties of the Propositus equally. It is the further case of the plaintiffs that Basappa died leaving behind a son namely Dundappa and three daughters namely Gangawwa, Akkawwa and Rupawwa, whereas Balappa died leaving behind his sons Chandrappa (plaintiff No.1), Shankar (plaintiff No.2), Mallappa (plaintiff No.3), Appasab (plaintiff No.4) and Maruti, as also the daughters namely Dund
A partition suit requires inclusion of all necessary parties to adjudicate claims on communal property, ensuring rights are accurately represented and adjudicated.
The court allowed the introduction of additional evidence in an appeal, highlighting the necessity to remand the case for reconsideration when vital evidence is not presented at the trial.
A suit for partial partition without including all necessary parties and joint family properties is not maintainable under the Hindu Succession Act.
Inpartition suits, all necessary parties and joint family properties must be included; dismissal for non-inclusion without adjudication on merits is legally improper.
A party must be afforded an opportunity to contest a case fully, especially when counterclaims and evidence are involved, ensuring a fair hearing in partition disputes.
A suit for partition may be maintainable without including all properties, and claims of prior arrangements need substantial evidence to be valid.
In matters of inheritance in joint family properties, ancestral status prevails unless a valid Will is presented; thus, equitable shares must be allocated accordingly.
The defendants were entitled to file a written statement and cross-examine witnesses even without filing the written statement, and the Court must consider their reasonable cause for not filing the w....
The right to partition in joint family properties persists regardless of contest, and the trial court’s decree must be grounded in evidence of joint possession.
The burden of proof lies with the plaintiffs to establish that properties claimed in a partition suit are joint family properties; mere assertions without evidence are insufficient.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.