Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
K.MANMADHA RAO
Managing Committee Badriya Jumma Masjid & Al-Madrasthul Badriya – Appellant
Versus
Sheik Abdulla S/o Moide – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. declaratory relief sought by plaintiffs. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. defendants challenge court's territorial jurisdiction. (Para 5 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. court affirms jurisdiction based on cause of action. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. writ petitions dismissed; no merit to interfere. (Para 17) |
ORDER :
1. Petitioner before this Court, in Writ Petition No.53076 of 2018 connected with Writ Petition No.53075 of 2018, is seeking to quash the Order dated 22.11.2018 passed on I.A.No.6 filed under Order VII Rule 1 and 4 read with Order I Rule 8 of CPC and I.A No.5 filed Order VII Rule 1 and 4 read with Order I Rule 8 of CPC respectively, in O.S.No.1242/2018 on the file of the II Additional Civil Judge and J.M.F.C, Mangaluru.
2. The Petitioners 1 to 9 were defendants No.1 to 9 and Respondents 1 to 5 were Plaintiffs No.1 to 5 before the trial Court.
3. The facts of the case are follows:
The Plaintiffs filed a suit in O.S.No.1242/2018 before the trial court for the declaration to declare the defendants are not authorized or empowered to deny entry to the children of the plaintiffs and of the persons represented by the plaintiffs in the plaint schedule Madrasa and consequently restrain the
The court affirmed that jurisdiction may arise where a partial cause of action occurs, allowing amendments to aid jurisdictional clarity in the interest of justice.
A plaint need not be returned if the plaintiff fails to demonstrate that the suit is admissible in another court.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the territorial jurisdiction of a court to entertain a suit for immovable property is determined by the location of the property as per Sec....
Jurisdiction under Section 16 of CPC mandates that actions affecting property must be brought in the court where the property is situated, irrespective of contractual jurisdiction clauses.
At the stage of deciding an application under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC, the Court is only required to go through the contents of the plaint to determine territorial jurisdiction.
Issue of territorial jurisdiction – When suit is ripe for trial and it is posted for evidence of Plaintiff, adjudication of issue of territorial jurisdiction of Court will certainly be a piece-meal t....
Civil courts lack jurisdiction over disputes involving Wakf properties as per the WAKF ACT, sections 83 and 85, which mandate that such matters be determined by the Wakf Tribunal.
Jurisdiction over immovable property cannot be altered by agreement; the local court where the property is situated retains jurisdiction.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
