Karnataka HC Notices Sri Lankan Judge's Rights Plea
07 Mar 2026
Karnataka Proposes Social Media Ban for Under-16s
07 Mar 2026
Justice Dharmadhikari Sworn In as 55th Madras HC Chief Justice
07 Mar 2026
Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M.NAGAPRASANNA
3M India Limited – Appellant
Versus
T.K. Ajith Kumar – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
ORDER :
1. The petitioner is before this court seeking the following prayers:
"(a) issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ, order, or direction to set aside and quash the Impugned Order dated 07.01.2025 passed by the Hon'ble LXXXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (CCH-83), Bengaluru, in Com. Ex.No.689/2024, (ANNEXURE A), (b) consequently, restore the execution petition in Com. Ex.No.689/2024 to the file of the Hon'ble LXXXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (CCH-83), Bengaluru, with a direction to dispose off the said execution with a period of six (6) months, an , (c) pass any other order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit on the basis of the facts and circumstances of the case, - in the interest of justice and equity."
2. Since the proceedings are closed before the concerned court without issuing notice, notice in the subject petition need not be issued.
3. The issue in the lis stands completely answered by the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Sumita Abhishek Sundaram Vs. Sankalpan Infrastructure (P) Ltd. <
The seat of arbitration determines jurisdiction for enforcement of awards, allowing execution within that jurisdiction despite asset relocations, emphasizing the need for transparency in asset disclo....
The enforcement of an arbitral award can be initiated anywhere in the country where the decree can be executed, without requiring a transfer of decree from the court with jurisdiction over the arbitr....
The main legal point established is that the Commercial Court has jurisdiction to entertain execution proceedings arising from an award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, and the award holde....
The court held that under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, only the court that entertained the initial arbitration application has jurisdiction to enforce the award, reinforcing exclusive enforc....
The determination of the arbitration 'seat' and 'venue' is critical; if the 'venue' does not specify a 'seat', jurisdiction lies with the designated court under the arbitration agreement.
Commercial Courts are empowered to execute arbitral awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, reaffirming the intent of the Commercial Courts Act for speedy resolution of commercial disputes....
The main legal principle established in the judgment is that the Commercial Court has the jurisdiction to execute its own decree or a decree transferred to it, where the value is above the specified ....
The court affirms that Additional District Judges have jurisdiction to handle arbitration awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, broadening the interpretation of 'Court' within this conte....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that only the High Court of Gujarat has jurisdiction to execute a foreign award under section 47 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and....
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.