SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 1475

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M.NAGAPRASANNA
3M India Limited – Appellant
Versus
T.K. Ajith Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Vegadarshi K.

ORDER :

1. The petitioner is before this court seeking the following prayers:

"(a) issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ, order, or direction to set aside and quash the Impugned Order dated 07.01.2025 passed by the Hon'ble LXXXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (CCH-83), Bengaluru, in Com. Ex.No.689/2024, (ANNEXURE A), (b) consequently, restore the execution petition in Com. Ex.No.689/2024 to the file of the Hon'ble LXXXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (CCH-83), Bengaluru, with a direction to dispose off the said execution with a period of six (6) months, an , (c) pass any other order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit on the basis of the facts and circumstances of the case, - in the interest of justice and equity."

2. Since the proceedings are closed before the concerned court without issuing notice, notice in the subject petition need not be issued.

3. The issue in the lis stands completely answered by the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Sumita Abhishek Sundaram Vs. Sankalpan Infrastructure (P) Ltd. 2025 SCC OnLine Kar. 14742. This Court on considering the identical circumstance has held as follows:

8. The afore-narrated facts, link in the cha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top