Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH
Shivashankar Amarannavar
Maqbool Sab @ Maqboob Baig Died Is Lrs. – Appellant
Versus
Putlibee, W/O Masthan Sab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Shivashankar Amarannavar, J.
This second appeal is filed by the appellant/plaintiff praying to set aside the judgment and decree dated 07.08.2009, passed in R.A.No.46/2005, by the learned Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Basavakalyan (Camp at Humnabad) and to restore the judgment and decree dated 29.08.2005, passed in O.S.No.115/1987, by the Principal Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.), Humnabad.
2. The appellant/plaintiff has filed a suit in O.S.No.115/1987 against the respondent/defendant seeking declaration that he is the owner of the suit land bearing Sy.No.86 measuring 3 acres 12 guntas situated at Madargi village, Humnabad Taluk and recovery of possession of the suit property from the respondent/defendant. The plaintiff has also sought relief of declaration that the registered release deed dated 16.03.1982 bearing No.7480 executed by Hayatbee as null and void and not binding upon the plaintiff and the plaintiff is entitled to get entered his name in the record of right in respect of the suit land.
3. The case of the plaintiff is based on the oral gift stated to have been executed by Khajasab in his favour when he was minor. The said Khajasab was maternal grandfather of the plaintiff and he was
The mother, as a de facto guardian, can accept an oral gift on behalf of her minor son when no legal guardian exists, validating the transfer of property rights under Mohammedan Law.
A gift under Mohammedan law requires explicit acceptance and possession; failure to prove these elements results in denial of ownership claims.
A de facto guardian lacks authority to transfer immovable property rights of a minor, rendering such transfers void ab initio.
The burden of proof lies on the person claiming an oral gift under Mahomedan Law, and the essential requirements for a valid oral gift must be satisfied.
A valid gift under Mohammedan Law requires declaration, acceptance, and delivery of possession, all of which must be sequentially satisfied.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for proper endorsement on stamp papers for oral gift memorandums and the significance of possession and documentary evidence in ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
