Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
E.S.Indiresh
Nagalakshmamma @ Nagarathnamma, W/O Late G. Thimmappa – Appellant
Versus
Thyagaraju, W/O Late G. Thimmappa – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
E.S. Indiresh, J.
This appeal is preferred by the plaintiffs assailing the judgment and decree dated 20.11.2014 in R.A.No.87/2014 on the file of Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Chikkaballapura, allowing the appeal in part and decreeing the suit of the plaintiffs in respect of item No.1 in O.S.No.143/2010 on the file of Civil Judge, Bagepalli, dismissing the suit of the plaintiffs as per the judgment and decree dated 13.03.2014.
2. For the sake convenience, parties are referred to as per their ranking before the Trial Court.
3. It is the case of the plaintiffs that, late Sri. G. Thimmappa and Smt. Nagalakshmamma (plaintiff No.1) are the parents of plaintiff Nos.2, 3 and the defendant.
4. It is the case of the plaintiffs that, the suit schedule properties are the ancestral properties of the plaintiffs and the defendant and as such, the plaintiffs are entitled for share in the suit schedule properties. It is also stated that, the plaintiffs filed a suit in O.S.No.160/2009 which came to be dismissed for non-prosecution on 02.11.2010. Further it is stated that, the plaintiffs have been advised to file a suit in O.S.No.143/2010 based on new cause of action and accordingly t
The court established that evidence must substantiate claims of oral partition, prioritizing the registered Partition Deed as definitive proof for ancestral property entitlements under the Hindu Succ....
The court reaffirmed that properties allotted in a partition retain ancestral status, entitling descendants with rights despite claims of separate property post-partition.
A joint family property remains so despite claims of prior partition; a coparcener retains rights to inheritance under the Hindu Succession Act.
Daughters are entitled to equal share in ancestral joint family property under Sec. 6 of the Hindu Succession Amendment Act 2005.
The court affirmed that partition shares from ancestral property remain joint family property for descendants, entitling them to assert claims over the inherited property.
Widow's right to claim share in ancestral property established under Hindu Succession Act, where properties purchased through ancestral nucleus retain joint family character.
The heavy burden of proof upon the proponent of oral partition before it is accepted, as per the settled principle of law by the Apex Court.
The court affirmed that properties devolving under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act are absolute and not ancestral, emphasizing that mere assertions cannot establish joint family character witho....
The ancestral property, while partitioned, remains joint family property, allowing children of a coparcener to claim their legitimate share despite their father's sale to others.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
