Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
C.M.JOSHI
Dhuma Suvarna, S/o Late Sheena Karkera – Appellant
Versus
Mohammad juneda, S/o Mr. Najeer Ahamad Mulla – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim for compensation due to accident (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments on contributory negligence and compensation (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. assessment of contributory negligence (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. evaluation of compensation amount (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. final decision and order (Para 21 , 22) |
JUDG
JUDGMENT :
C.M. JOSHI, J.
Heard the learned counsel appearing for appellants and respondent No.2-Insurance Company in these appeals.
2. Being aggrieved by the judgment and award passed in MVC No.338/2009 and MVC No.339/2009 by the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge and Additional MACT, Udupi, dated 28.01.2013, the petitioners in both the petitions have approached this Court in these appeals seeking enhancement of compensation.
3. The factual matrix of the case is that, on 31.12.2008, at 11.40 p.m., on NH-17, the deceased were travelling on a motor cycle bearing No.KA.19.H.6020 towards Mangalore, and near Karavali Junction at Udupi, a lorry bearing No. KA.22.A-5781 came from the back side of the motorcycle of the deceased and dashed against it, resulting in their death. Alleging that the accident was due to the negligence on the part of the driver of the l
Court affirmed that contributory negligence can be apportioned among parties, and under composite negligence, claimants can seek full compensation from any tortfeasor.
In cases of composite negligence, claimants can recover full compensation from any joint tortfeasor with liability ratios determined for inter se recovery rights.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between contributory and composite negligence and the application of this distinction in determining compensation in motor accident....
Contributory negligence and compensation assessment in motor accident claims were affirmed, with the court highlighting the importance of valid driving documentation in determining liability.
The court confirmed the necessity of correctly assessing contributory negligence and future income prospects when determining compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, emphasizing adherence to prior....
Contributory negligence must be established with evidence; mere assumptions are insufficient to negate liability. Compensation modified based on medical evidence and disability assessment.
Section 140 of M.V. Act is read as liability to pay compensation in certain cases on principle of no fault.
Family mainly the widow would as per the rules will receive a sum, which will aggregate to upto 2025 Rs. 67,28,256/- for a period of 12 years which will not permit us to disturb the findings as far n....
The proper assessment of negligence and income in fatal accident cases is essential for determining just compensation, reinforced by precedent in awarding future loss prospects.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
