Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ASHOK S.KINAGI
Vishwakarma Sahakara Bank Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Registrar Of Co-Operative Societies And Recovery Officer, Karnataka State Urban Banks – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. sequence of events leading to petitions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. multiple arguments presented by parties. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's assessment of prior proceedings. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. final order quashing earlier decision. (Para 12) |
ORDER :
Ashok S.Kinagi, J.
These writ petitions are filed challenging the order dated 28.12.2015 passed by respondent No.2 (WP No.12667/2016) in Appeal No.1/2009-10 filed under Section 106 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 (‘Act’ for short).
2. WP No.12667/2016 is filed by the Society, WP No.18951/2016 is filed by the auction purchaser and WP No.64567/2016 is filed by the purchaser of the property under reference from the auction purchaser (petitioner in WP No.18951/2016). For convenience, the parties are referred to based on their rankings in WP No.12667/2016.
3. Brief facts leading rise to the filing of these petitions are as follows:
3.1. The petitioner is a Co-operative Society registered under the Act. Respondent No.5 obtained a loan from the petitioner-Society by mortgage in a sum of Rs.5,15,000/- on 19.12.2003. Respondent No.5 failed to repay the loan amount. The petitioner-Society invoked arbitration clause fo
The appellate authority must provide a reasoned decision and consider all relevant materials presented in cases regarding loan recovery under cooperative societies' laws.
Court affirmed the validity of sales under execution, emphasizing the importance of timely objections and statutory adherence in contesting such actions.
The court held that non-compliance with a prior court order precludes a party from challenging an award, affirming the binding nature of statutory orders under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Ac....
Court upheld the validity of bank's actions under cooperative law, ruling that delayed challenges based on fraud were insufficient; commercial agreements should be honored.
A sale officer may proceed to sell a defaulter's properties other than mortgaged property in applying for debt recovery if suitable under the cooperative society's regulations.
Payments made to a third party do not constitute valid discharge of debt obligations to the primary creditor under cooperative society regulations.
Bank officials, as custodians of hypothecated goods, are expected to follow proper legal procedures in conducting auctions and extracting maximum amounts from the hypothecated goods.
An application under Rule 52 (13) (i) of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Rules, 1964, to set aside a sale of mortgaged property must be filed within 30 days from the date of sale. Failure to....
An arbitration clause in a Memorandum of Understanding precludes a court from entertaining a statutory application where an arbitrator has been appointed to resolve the dispute, reinforcing the prima....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
