IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
G.BASAVARAJA
Devaraju S/o Ramaiah D.R. – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
G. BASAVARAJA, J.
1. The appellants have preferred this appeal against the judgment of conviction and order and sentence passed by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tumkur in S.C No.247/2011 dated 07.07.2015.
2. During the pendency of the case, accused No.2-Ramaiah passed away. Hence, in view of order dated 23.10.2025, the appeal against deceased appellant No.2/accused No.2 stands abated.
3. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to as per their status before the trial Court.
4. The brief facts leading to this appeal are that the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tumkur Town Sub-Division, Tumakuru submitted the charge-sheet against the accused for the offences punishable under Section 498A, 304B read with 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
5. It is alleged by the prosecution that, complainant's daughter Narasamma @ Savitha was given in marriage to accused No.1. Accused Nos.2 and 3 are the parents of accused No.1. Accused No.4 is the brother of accused No.1. At the time of marriage negotiation, accused demanded dowry of Rs.10,000/- a gold chain and gold ring to accused No.1 and a set of hangings to the b
Prosecution must clearly establish essential ingredients of dowry-related offences; lack of consistent evidence led to acquittal.
Prosecution failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate claims of dowry harassment leading to suicide, rendering conviction under IPC Sections 498A and 306 unsustainable.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that to convict an accused under Section 304-B IPC, the prosecution must prove that the deceased was subjected to cruelty or harassment in connecti....
Conviction under Section 498A IPC upheld due to consistent evidence of dowry-related torture; acquitted under Section 304B IPC for lack of proof regarding abnormal death circumstances.
Conviction set aside - Cruelty and Dowry Death - Prosecution failed to prove cause of death of deceased because report of autopsy surgeon shows that she was not in a position to give his final opinio....
The requirement of substantial evidence of dowry-related harassment is essential to sustain a conviction under Section 304-B of IPC, which the prosecution failed to demonstrate.
In cases where the evidence is of a circumstantial nature, the circumstances from which the conclusion of guilt is to be drawn should in the first instance be fully established, and all the facts so ....
Dowry death and cruelty – For attracting Section 113-B of Evidence Act, prosecution must establish that deceased was subjected by appellant to cruelty or harassment for or in connection with any dema....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.