Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ANU SIVARAMAN, VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
Nexon Omniverse Limited – Appellant
Versus
N.P. Raveendranath Naidu Son Of Krishna Naidu – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL, J.
This appeal is filed by the appellant/plaintiff under Section 13 (1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (for short 'the Act') read with Order XLIII Rule 1(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short 'CPC') challenging the order dated 02.08.2024 passed on I.A.No.4 in Com.O.S.No.1171/2023 by the LXXXVII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (Exclusively Dedicated Commercial Court) at Bengaluru (CCH-88) (for short 'Commercial Court').
2. Sri. R.V.S. Naik, learned Senior counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the Trial Court has rightly held that the nature of premises as per the Memorandum of Understanding (for short 'MoU') is termed as the 'commercial premises' with exclusive statement that the premises is sought to be used for apparel business. However, the Trial Court proceeded to hold that the dispute cannot be classified as a commercial dispute as the premises were sought to be used but not 'already in use'. It is submitted that the MoU makes it clear on many accounts that the premises were sought to be used for trade and commerce and that the property is a commercial property, which has not been rightly appreciated by the Co
A dispute involving immovable property intended for commercial use is a commercial dispute under the Commercial Courts Act, even if not currently in use, contradicting the lower court's interpretatio....
A dispute arising from an agreement to sell immovable property used for trade is a commercial dispute, mandating resolution in a Commercial Court, as clarified by statutory definitions.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the strict construction of the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act, the requirement to consider the nature of the proposed amendment before ....
A dispute regarding a lease for commercial purposes qualifies as a commercial dispute under the Commercial Courts Act, necessitating the jurisdiction of the Commercial Court.
A suit for specific performance of an MOU regarding redevelopment of residential property does not constitute a commercial dispute under the Commercial Courts Act if the property is not used exclusiv....
The determination of whether premises qualify as a commercial dispute hinges on actual use, not merely the designation of the property as residential.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
