Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY
P. Nataraju, Since Deceased By His Lrs,- Smt. B. Eswaramma, (W/o. Late Sri P. Nataraj) – Appellant
Versus
S. Venkataram, S/o. Late Sri. Y. Subba Rao – Respondent
ORDER :
S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J.
Plaintiff is before this Court in this writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to issue a writ of mandamus directing the Trial Court to dispose of applications filed on behalf of the plaintiff in O.S.No.620/2010 under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of CPC vide Annexures-J and K.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that application vide Annexure-J under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of CPC was filed on 26.07.2010. Subsequently seeking similar relief, yet another application has been filed on 11.07.2019. The Trial Court has not passed orders on both the applications. He submits that he does not press his prayer made in the application vide Annexure-J and he would be satisfied if the Trial Court is directed to consider and dispose of the application dated 11.07.2019 filed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC vide Annexure-K.
3. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the contesting respondents submits that prayer made in the application has been rendered infructuous having regard to the subsequent developments.
4. Be that as it may, fact remains that the applications which ar
The court emphasized the need for timely resolution of applications in legal proceedings, directing the Trial Court to address the pending injunction application within a specified time to uphold jus....
The court mandated the trial court to expedite the consideration of an interim application after confirming defendants' appearances and objections, emphasizing procedural efficiency.
The court allowed the petitioner to pursue a pending application for interim relief while ensuring protection against eviction until the trial court's decision.
The court upheld the necessity of adhering to procedural timelines in civil proceedings, emphasizing that applications under Order VII Rule 11 are independent of written statements.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
