Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ANU SIVARAMAN, VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
Poojari Narayanappa, Since Dead By Lrs.- Smt. Konamma, W/o. Late Poojari Narayanappa – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka, Revenue Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. invocation of appeal under karnataka high court act. (Para 1) |
| 2. error in appreciation of evidence by single judge. (Para 2) |
| 3. support from respondents for single judge's order. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 4. consideration of arguments from both parties. (Para 6) |
| 5. issue of delay in restoration applications. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 6. citations from previous cases on delay in applications. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 7. delay in applications affects restoration entitlement. (Para 12) |
| 8. dismissal of the appeal due to lack of merits. (Para 13) |
JUDGMENT :
VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL, J.
This appeal is filed by the appellants under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging the order dated 24.09.2020 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.13630/2014 (SC/ST).
2. Sri.V.K.Narayana Swamy, learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that the learned Single Judge has committed an error in allowing the writ petition without appreciating the material available on record in its proper perspective. It is submitted that the learned Single Judge has failed to appreciate the findings recorded by respondent Nos.2 and 3, wherein the appellant's application for restoration was allowed and the a
Unreasonable delay in restoration applications under statute undermines claims, establishing strict compliance with statutory timelines as essential for legal proceedings.
Applications for resumption and restoration under welfare legislations must be filed within a reasonable period, as excessive delay impacts justiciability.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that applications for resumption of land under the Act must be filed within a reasonable time, and inordinate delay without a prima facie explanati....
Applications for restoration of land under the Act must be made within a reasonable time; unreasonable delay can bar relief despite the absence of a statutory limitation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
