Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
VIBHU BAKHRU, CJ, C.M. POONACHA
T Byregowda, S/o. Late Thammanna – Appellant
Versus
Nagabhushana K, S/o. K Hanumantha Rao – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. condonation of delay in filing appeals. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. claims regarding ownership and conversion of land. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 13) |
| 3. jurisdiction and authority under klr act. (Para 12 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. possession established through previous judgments. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 5. dismissal of appeals and disposal of pending applications. (Para 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT :
VIBHU BAKHRU, CJ.
1. For the reasons stated in the affidavits accompanying the applications seeking condonation of delay, the same are allowed. The delay in filing the appeals is condoned.
2. The appellant has filed the present appeals impugning a common order dated 03.06.2024 [impugned order] passed by the learned Single Judge in a batch of writ petitions being W.P.No.17888/2015 (KLR-RR-SUR) connected with W.P.No.48758/2014, W.P.No.49776/2014, W.P.No.50678/2014, W.P.No.51209/2014 and W.P.No.58454/2014.
3. The writ petitioners in the said petitions are arrayed as respondents in the respective appeals arising from the impugned common order passed in the writ petitions.
4. The controversy involved is in a narrow compass and is common, therefore, the appeals are taken up together and disposed of by this common order.
5
Once land is converted to non-agricultural purposes, revenue authorities cannot alter land records, and disputes regarding title must be resolved through civil courts.
A party with a vested interest in land rights must be included in appellate proceedings regarding that property to ensure fair representation and adjudication.
Point of Law : Since at this stage petitioner's application is not accepted, it would not prevent the petitioner from all time to come not to repeat the request after disposal of inter se litigations....
Revenue authorities must continue with mutation proceedings irrespective of civil disputes, as entries in records do not determine title but are essential for fiscal purposes.
Point of law: Re-opening of case - Mainly because there is change in the position of law by virtue of decisions rendered by this Court or by the Hon'ble Apex Court, the cases which have attained fina....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
