Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
M. NAGAPRASANNA
Manjurillahi S/O. Mohammedrafiq Shamsher – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka, By It’s Secretary Home Dept. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners harassed by police practices (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments regarding rowdy registration procedures (Para 2 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observations on procedural law (Para 3 , 4) |
ORDER :
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J.
1. The petitioners are before the Court in these petitions on a frequent circumstance of they being called for parade or being harassed by the police unnecessarily.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the name of the petitioners are drawn or will be drawn in the list of rowdies is the apprehension. In the event that is to be drawn, the learned counsel submits that the law as declared by the Co- ordinate bench in W.P.No.4504 of 2021, disposed on 22.04.2022, should be followed in the case of B.S.PRAKASH VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS .
3. The learned AGA submits that the petitions are premature as these petitions are instituted only on an apprehension that the petitioners are being called by the police for the purpose of parade or investigation or enquiry as the cases would be.
4. Be that as it may. In the light of the aforesaid circumstance that has led the petitioners to this Court, it is needless to observe that the State would not flout the law as
Individuals cannot be listed as rowdies without adhering to established guidelines and ensuring due process, particularly for those acquitted of offenses.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
