SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 2901

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
UMESH M ADIGA
PRAKASH HEGDE K – Appellant
Versus
DOLPHY D SOUZA – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

UMESH M.ADIGA, J.

This appeal is filed by the appellant/claimant being aggrieved by the judgment and award dated 30.11.2019 passed by the IV Additional District Judge and Member, MACT, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore (for short `Tribunal'), in MVC No.331/2018, seeking enhancement of compensation.

2. Though the matter is slated for admission, with consent of learned advocates appearing for both the sides, it is taken up for final disposal.

3. Heard the arguments of the learned counsel appearing for the claimant as well as the insurer.

4. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking before the Tribunal.

5. The brief facts of the case are that, on 08.11.2017, at about 01.00 am (midnight), the claimant met with an accident near Canara Bank, Balemakki, Sulia, due to the rash and negligent driving of a car bearing registration No.KA-19-AA-3062. As a result, the claimant sustained injuries and has suffered permanent disability. With these reasons, the claimant has prayed for awarding compensation of Rs.30,00,000/-.

6. Respondent No.1 was the owner and respondent No.2 was the insurer of the offending car. Respondent No.1 remained ex parte before the Tribuna

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top