IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Shah and Naik V.A. , JJ.
Appellants: State and Ors.
Vs.
Respondent: Murlidhar Govardhan and Ors.
Criminal Ref. No. 199 of 1958 and Criminal Revn. Appln. Nos. 1247, 1248, 1250, 1253 and 1254 of 1958
Decided On: 02.09.1959
Counsels:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: Y.V. Chandrachud, Govt. Pleader
For Respondents/Defendant: D.A. Mundkur, Adv. for S.G. Samant, Adv.
MAGISTRATE JURISDICTION - CHARGE SHEET - SECTION 173, 190(1)(B), 204 - A magistrate has the power to direct an investigating officer to submit a charge sheet in a cognizable offence even if the officer has submitted a report requesting a summary "A, B, or C" under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Fact of the Case:
A police constable was found drunk in a house, and an investigation was initiated. The investigating officer submitted a final report to the magistrate, requesting that a "summary A" be issued, as he believed there was insufficient evidence to warrant a charge sheet.
Finding of the Court:
The magistrate rejected the request for a summary and directed that a charge sheet be sent up against the constable, observing that the facts of the case did not support the investigating officer's conclusion.
Issues: 1. Whether a magistrate has the power to direct an investigating officer to submit a charge sheet when the officer has requested a summary "A, B, or C" under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. Whether the magistrate's order directing the submission of a charge sheet was a judicial or administrative order.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The magistrate has the power to supervise the investigation of a cognizable offence by a police officer and to take cognizance of the offence upon receiving a report from the officer under Section 173. 2. The magistrate's order directing the submission of a charge sheet is a judicial order, as the magistrate must consider the report and decide whether to issue a summary or order the filing of a charge sheet.
Final Decision: The court held that the magistrate has the power to direct an investigating officer to submit a charge sheet in a cognizable offence, even if the officer has submitted a report requesting a summary "A, B, or C" under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The court discharged the rule in the revision applications, which raised the same question.
(2) We may briefly set out the facts which give rise to this reference. Police constable Murlidhar Goverdhan Patel, attached to the Thana Prohibition Department, was foud drunk in the house of one Gunyabai, investigation was commenced in respect of this incident and a final report was submitted y the investigating officer to the judicial Magistrate F.C. Tnana, requesting that "A" summary be issued. The reasons in support of the request were:
1. That the accused was not found in personal possession of illicit liqour.
2. That there was also no evidene to show if he was ound drunk in a public place.
3. That the main witnesses in the case were interested against the prosecution and they may turn hostile because they were themselves prosecuted for an offcence under Prohibition Act.
4. That there was no eveidence to connnect the accused with the liqour bottles that were found in the house of Gunyabai.
The Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Thana obseved that the facts of the case did not warrant the assumption made by the Investigating Officer in asking for "A summary and directed that a charge sheet be sent up against the constable wihtout making "the witnesses as hostile even before they were given a fair opportunity to come before the court and depose on oath."
(3) Against this order a reision application was preferred by the State to the Court of Session at Thana. the learned Sessions Judge has made a reference to this court recommending thatthe order of the trial Magistrate be set aside and in the alternative, "C" summary be granted on the repot made by the Investigating officer.
(4) The Government pleader ppearing in support of the reference contends tha a Magistrate has no power to call for a charge sheet from a police Officer who after investigating a cognizable cse has submitted a report that a summary "A, B, or C" be issued. It is urged that the opinion of the investigating officer investigating a cognizable offence that the evidence does not warrant the submission of a charge sheet against the person accused of an offecne is binding on the magistrate and the latter is incompent to call upon the officer to submit a charge summary. The learned Government Pleader has in suport of his submisstion invited our attention to a number of decisions, but he has fairly conceded that some of these decisions contains the decision of these cases. Before we refer to these authorities, we may examine the scheme of the Code relating to the investigating of offences. Chapter XIV of the code falls in Part V which powers to investigate. A Police Officer is empowered to investigate into any cognizable offence without the order of a magistrate. In respect of a non cognizable offence, the Police Officer has no power without an order from a Magistrate to commence investigation. Where a Police Officer has received information about or has reason to suspect the commission of a cogbnizable offene, he must forthwith send a report of the same to a Magistrate empowered to take cognizable of such offence upon a police report and to proceed in person, or depute one of his ubordinate officers to investigate the facts and circumstances of the case and, if necessary, to take measures for the discovery and arrest of offender (S.157) A Magistrate receiving a report from Police Officer relating to the commission of Cogniziable offence, may direct an investigation or if the case in manner provided by the dispose of, the case in manner provided by the code (S. 159) Power is also conferred upon certain Magistrates to record statements of confessions in the course of the investigation under Chapte
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.