JUDGMENT - D.N. MEHTA, J.:---The two petitioners in this Criminal Revision Application, who are mother and son respectively, have impugned the judgment and order of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nanded, dated 27-9-1977 dismissed the petitioners application for maintenance under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further passing an order of costs of Rs. 20/- in favour of the first opponent and against the petitioners.

2. The first petitioner claimed to be the legally wedded wife of the 1st opponent. The second petitioner claimed to be the son born of the wedlock of the first petitioner and the 1st opponent. The first petitioner stated that she was born a Hindu and had been originally name as Rukmini and her fathers name was Malhari and her mothers name was Manabai. After the death of her mother, her father married a lady named Shevantabai. After her fathers death Shevantabai remarried one Pundlik and they went to live at Nanded, on the land belonging to the 1st opponent. The 1st petitioner stated that she was married to one Shankar who hailed from village Bachoti. A son named Suraj was born out of this first marriage.

3. The 1st petitioner then stated that ab

Click Here to Read the rest of this document