SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Bom) 24

R.S.BHONSALE
Dattatraya Narayan Samant (Dr. ) & others – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


THE

Bombay Case Reporter

1982(1)

1982(1) Bom.C.R. 1

Before :

R.S. Bhonsale, J.

Dattatraya Narayan Samant (Dr.) & others .... Petitioners.

Versus

State of Maharashtra .... Respondents.


Criminal Application No. 1764 of 1980, decided on 22-1-1981.

(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860, Secs. 120-B, 307 & 115---Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Secs. 227, 228 & 482---Constitution of India, Art. 227---Framing of charge against petitioners---Order of Additional Sessions Judge---Whether there are sufficient grounds for proceeding to frame charges---Alleged agreement between petitioners and accused No. 5---Whether order is justified by facts and circumstances of case---Held, no prima facie case of conspiracy against petitioners, accused Nos. 1 to 4 made out.

Under the provisions of section 228 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Judge can frame charges after hearing the parties and after considering the records and documents, if he is of the opinion that there is ground for presuming that the accused had committed an offence which is triable either by the Chief Judicial Magistrate or by himself. In such a situation, he will frame in writing charges against the accused. The provisions of




















































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top