SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Bom) 174

G.D.KAMAT, G.F.COUTO
Abdul Satar S/o. Ahmed Sattar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT - Dr. G. F. COUTO, J.:---This appeal by the original accused is directed against the judgment dated 4th November, 1987, continued on 11th the same month, whereby the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Panaji, convicted him for offences punishable under sections 20(b)(ii) and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), and further sentenced him to undergo 10 years of Rigorous Imprisonment and to pay a fine of rupees one lakh, and in default to undergo a further period of 2 years Rigorous Imprisonment on each count, the substantive sentence having been ordered to run concurrently.

2. A charge sheet had been filed by the Calangute Police against the appellant for offence punishable under section 20(b)(ii) and 21 of the Act. The gravamen of the charge is that on 5th March, 1986, at about 8.00 a.m. and at Calangute, the appellant was found in possession of 1 kg. of charas and 30 gms. of brown sugar in contravention of section 8 of the Act. The case of the police indeed is that on that particular day and time, a police party raided the house of the appellant, who in the course of the search, produced the said 1 kg. of cha

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top