SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Bom) 312

H.D.PATEL
Indian Tobacco Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Industrial Court, Mah. Nagpur Bench & another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - H.D. PATEL, J.:---The petitioner is a Public Limited Company having branches throughout the country. One such branch is also at Nagpur and is registered under the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948. According to the petitioner, the employment of persons in the branch never exceeded seven in number.

2. The respondent No. 2 was appointed on a probation as a Sales Representative for the establishment at Nagpur under the contract of employment vide order dated 14-2-1984. The relevant terms of the contract are reproduced below :---

"1. You will be placed on probation in the designation 'Sales Representation' for a period of 12 months commencing from 14th February, 1984 upto 13th February, 1985 or for such extended period as may be determined by Management and as advised to you.

2. ..............

3. ..............

4. ..............

5. You will be bound by the terms and conditions of the service as contained in the aforesaid Annexure-I as well as by the Standing Orders applicable to Nagpur branch, enclosed herewith as Annexure-II.

6. ..............."

The respondent No. 2 accepted the offer and signed the contract of probationary employment. According to the petitioner, the work




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top