P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY, S.N.DWIVEDI
Western India Match Company – Appellant
Versus
Workmen – Respondent
Judgment
DWIVEDI, J.:- The Western India Match Company Limited, Bareilly (hereinafter called the Company) is governed by the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 (hereinafter called the Act). It appears that it has a separate Standing Order for the Watch and Ward Staff: According to the Standing Order there are five categories of workmen. (1) Permanent, (2) Probationer, (3) Substitute, (4) Temporary, and (5) Apprentice. A permanent workman is one "who has completed a probationary period of two months as such and is employed on a permanent post." A probationer is a workman "who is provisionally employed to fill a permanent vacancy and has not completed two months Service." (emphasis added )
2. The Company appointed one Prem Singh as a watchman on September 1, 1965. The letter of appointment states that he would be "on probation for a period of six months." We shall hereafter refer to this contract of service as a "special agreement." The period of probation expired on March 1, 1966, but he continued to serve on his post. On April 13, 1966 the Company passed an order extending the period of his probation by two months with retrospective effect from March 1, 1966. Nine days
referred to : Air-India Corporation, Bombay v. V. A. Rebellow
Avery India Ltd. v. Second Industrial tribunal, West Bengal
relied on : Salem Erode Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. v. Employees Union
approved : Agra Electric Supply Co. Ltd. v. Sri Alladin
Hindustan Steel Ltd., Rourkela v. A. K. Roy
Management of Panitole Tea Estate v. Workmen
Francis Klein and Co. Private Ltd. v. Workmen
United Provineces Electric Supply Co. Ltd., Allahabad v. Their Workmen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.