SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Bom) 83

A.C.AGARWAL
Bhanu M. Vakil – Appellant
Versus
Chandra Oshiram Keswani & another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - ASHOK AGARWAL, J.:---Whether the present criminal prosecution under section 630 of the Companies Act is liable to be stayed pending the suit for possession under section 13(1)(g) of the Bombay Rent Act is the short question that arises for my determination in the present writ petition.

2. The petitioner is the original accused while the respondent No. 1 is the complainant in Criminal Code No. 76 of 1983 pending in the Court of the learned Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 19th Court, Esplanade, Bombay. This complaint has been filed under section 630 of the Companies Act. The respondent No. 2 is the State of Maharashtra.

3. The facts of the present case, as stated in the present petition, are as under:---

The premises in dispute is a residential flat being flat No. 1-A at Alta View Co-operative Housing Society, situate at 7 Altamount Road, Bombay 400 026. This flat was originally owned by one D.D. Solanki who happened to own five flats in that building. By an agreement dated 1st May, 1968 the said D.D. Solanki gave his aforesaid flat No. 1-A to Esso Standard Eastern Incorporated, the predecessors of the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation, respondent No. 1 in the present pet




















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top