SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Bom) 179

SHARAD MANOHAR, G.D.KAMAT
Shakal Abdul Gaffor – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & another – Respondent


Judgment

S. M. DAUD, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition under Article 226 of the constitution takes exception to documents marked Exs. R and S and the alleged deprivation of petitioner from a right to occupy flat No. G, third floor of what was formerly known as Fazalbhoy House and is now known as Kakad House.

( 2 ) THE building afore-mentioned consisting of five floors formerly belonged to the Trust Settlement of Bai Sherbanoo wife of Mr. Abdulla Fazalbhoy. That Trust is presently represented by respondents 4 to 6. The Trust owned the building till the year 1981 when the said building was conveyed to respondent No. 7.

( 3 ) AFTER outbreak of the second world war the then Government enacted for amongst other things the better and more efficient prosecution of the war legislation in the shape of the Defence of India Act, 1939. Rules were framed (under this Act to enable requisitioning of property) and one such rule was that bearing 75-A. The said Rule reads as under:- (1) If in the opinion of the Central government or the Provincial Government it is necessary or expedient so to do for securing the defence of British India, Public safety, the maintenance of public order or the efficient prosecutio

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top