SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Bom) 342

B.N.SRIKRISHNA
Poddar Tyres Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Bedrock Sales Corporation Ltd. and another – Respondent


Judgment

B.N. SRIKRISHNA, J.:---This Notice of Motion has been taken out by the plaintiffs for the following reliefs :-

"(a) that, pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit, the defendants No. 1, by themselves, their servants and agents, be restrained by an order and injunction of this Hon'ble Court;

"(i) from infringing the plaintiffs' registered trade marks (Ex. 'A' to the plaint) and/or passing off the defendant No.1's business as and for the business of the plaintiffs by the use of the word "Bedrock" as part of the 1st defendants' corporate name; and

(ii) from infringing and/or passing of these 1st defendants' goods as and for the goods of the plaintiffs by the use of the word "Bedrock" in connection with or in respect of goods manufactured by them;

(b) that, pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit, the defendants No.1, by themselves, their servants and agents be ordered and directed to deliver up for destruction all their letter heads, invoices, price lists, cash memos, brochures, advertisements, etc. articles and effects bearing the impugned word "Bedrock",

2. This notice of motion illustrates the homely truth that greater the consanguinity between parties, more



























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top