SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Bom) 278

A.A.HALBE, H.H.KANTHARIA
State of Maharashtra and others – Appellant
Versus
Saifuddin Mujjaffarali Saifi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

A.A. HALBE, J.:—-The State of Maharashtra and its Officers have preferred this appeal against the judgment and decree passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Dhulia, in Special Civil Suit No. 17 of 1984, directing the appellant/State to pay Rs. 2,18,755/-, together with six per cent interest from the date of filing of the suit till realization to the respondent/plaintiff. The matter arises as follows.

The State proposed to construct the bridge across river Serpani at Mile No. 76 (622 Kms.) on Surat-Dhulia-Edlabad-Nagpur road. Accordingly, the tenders were invited and in response thereto various contractors submitted their tenders on due date and in time. On the scrutiny of those tenders, the tender of the plaintiff was found to be lowest as he had quoted rates at 4.91 per cent above the estimated rate. The plaintiff had attached certain conditions while submitting the tender, but later on withdrew those conditions and submitted the letter to that effect. Briefly, therefore, the tender of the plaintiff was accepted at the rate 4.91 per cent above the estimated amount of the tender. It seems that the tender was published for Rs. 4,55,273/-, but in pursuance of the accepta





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top