SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Bom) 670

E.S.DA SILVA, A.P.SHAH
Lalit Sehgal – Appellant
Versus
State of Goa and others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - A. P. SHAH, J.:---This group of writ petitions can be conveniently disposed of by a common judgment as they all seek to challenge the Notification No. 2-20-92 dated December 21, 1993 issued under section 13-A of the Goa, Daman and Diu Public Gambling Act, 1976 and also the restriction under the said section 13-A that games of electronic amusement/ slot machines can only be installed in Five Star Hotels as being violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

2. The Goa, Daman and Diu Public Gambling Act, 1976 (for short, "the Act") was amended by the Goa, Daman and Diu Public Gambling (Amendment) Act, 1992 (for short, "the Amendment Act"). The Amendment Act inserted into the Act a new section 13-A, which provides:-

"13-A Authorised Game : (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the Government may authorise any game of electronic amusement/ slot machines in Five Star Hotels subject to such conditions, including payment of such recurring and non-recurring fees, as may be prescribed.

(2) The provisions of this Act shall not apply to any game authorised under sub-section (1)."

3. Thus, the Amendment Act permitted the Government to authorise games of elec





































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top