JUDGMENT - V.P. TIPNIS, J. :---We have heard this petition for a considerable length of time. We have heard Shri Singh learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri Apte learned Additional Advocate General of the State of Maharashtra for respondent Nos. 1 and 3.

2.By this petition the petitioner is seeking quashing and setting aside the selection and appointment of 5th respondent Shri Dravid and 6th respondent Shri Sakhalkar as Administrative Members of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal at Aurangabad and Nagpur Benches respectively. There are several other reliefs claimed in the petition. The only other relief which is relevent, is further direction to consider the petitioner for appointment as Administrative Member for the aforesaid posts.

3.Upon enquiry the petitioner signified his willingness to be considered for appointment as Administrative Member of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Aurangabad Bench and in fact he accordingly applied on 2nd July 1994 for the purpose. In a meeting held on 6-2-1995 by the Selection Committee one G.B. Pingulkar was selected for the post of Administrative Member of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Aurangabad Bench. The petitione

Click Here to Read the rest of this document