SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Bom) 179

A.Y.SAKHARE, M.B.SHAH
State of Bihar and others – Appellant
Versus
Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. and others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - A.Y. SAKHARE, J.:---This appeal is filed by the original defendant Nos. 4, 5 and 6 in Suit No. 3295 of 1992, challenging the order dated 9th February 1996 passed by the learned Single Judge in Notice of Motion No. 2475 of 1992. By the impugned order the learned Single Judge has restrained the defendant Nos. 1 to 3 viz., the State Bank of India, State Bank of Patiala and Indian Bank from making the payment, under the bank guarantees and the defendant Nos. 4 to 6 viz., State of Bihar, Superintending Engineer and Executive Engineer, are restrained from invoking the bank guarantees.

2.On 25th April 1989, the plaintiffs were awarded a contract for construction of Icha dam across river Khadkai at village Kuju, Bihar for an amount of Rs. 39,71,31,019. The duration of the contract was for a period of 42 months, i.e. upto 24th April 1992. Clause 5 of the said contract provides for obligation on the part of the plaintiffs to furnish bank guarantee for 10% of the contract price as performance guarantee. Clause 9 of the contract casts obligation upon the plaintiffs to furnish bank guarantees against mobilisation advance given by the defendant Nos. 4 to 6. As per the plaintiffs the b



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top