SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Bom) 464

R.M.LODHA
John Joseph Khokar – Appellant
Versus
B. S. Bhadange and others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - R.M. LODHA, J.:---The only question raised in the present writ petition and that needs consideration is: whether the petitioner John Joseph Khokar is a workman within the meaning of section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

2. The said question arises from the facts which briefly stated are: The petitioner was appointed in the Mazgaon Dock Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act having its factory at Dockyard Road, Mazgaon, Bombay -- 2nd Respondent on 10th April, 1968 as Fitter-Weapon in the Weapon and Electronic Department. On 1-2-1970 he was promoted as Weapon Mechanic Grade II. He was then promoted as highly skilled employee on 1-6-72. Further promotion was accorded to the petitoner on 2-12-1975 in Special Marine Grade and thereafter as Mistry on 1-6-1976. The next promotional post from Mistry is Chargehand and Petitioner alleges that one post of Chargehand fell vacant on 1-4-86. On 19-11-87 Shri K.D. Lodh, the 3rd respondent was promoted on the post of chargehand w.e.f 1-12-86 though according to petitioner, the respondent No. 3 was much junior to him and was also promoted as Mistry much later than him. The Petitioner filed the complaint before






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top