SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Bom) 536

V.H.BHAIRAVIA
Satish Vishwanath Palasdekar & others – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT - BHAIRAVIA V.H., J.:---This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 29-11-1993 passed by the learned Second Additional Judge, Satara, in Sessions Case No. 131 of 1992, whereby the appellants have been held guilty for offences punishable under section 304-A read with section 34, Indian Penal Code and section 330 read with section 34, Indian Penal Code and sentenced each of them to suffer further S.I. for 6 months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default to suffer S.I. for one month for offence punishable under section 304-A read with section 34, Indian Penal Code and also sentenced each of them to suffer S.I. for 6 months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default to suffer further S.I. for one month. Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 9-12-1990 the appellant-accused No. 1 was working as P.S.I., appellant-accused No. 2 was working as Police Head Constable and appellants-accused Nos. 3 to 5 were working as police constables. All of them were attached to Vaduj Police Station. It is the further prosecution case that Crime No. 125/90 of theft was registered with the said Police Station and the in



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top