B.N.SRIKRISHNA, UPASANI PRATIBHA
Tata Hydro-Electric Power Supply Company Ltd. and others – Appellant
Versus
Principal Secretary, Energy and Environment, Government of Maharashtra and others – Respondent
B.N. SRIKRISHNA, J.:---The writ petitioners in this case challenge the setting up of a Cryogenic Liquefied Petroleum Gas (L.P.G.) storage and handling facility in close vicinity of their establishments, on several grounds including ground of mala fides on the part of the statutory authorities in granting the requisite licence and clearances and also on the ground that the said facility is hazardous environmentally and violative of the Coastal Region Zone Regulations (C.R.Z.).
2. The petitioners are companies registered under the Companies Act, 1956, belonging to the Tata Group of Companies and doing the business of generation, transmission and bulk distribution of electricity in their area of supply in Greater Mumbai under licence granted by the State Government under the provisions of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910.
3. Respondent No. 1 is the State of Maharashtra; respondent No. 2 is the Bombay Municipal Corporation; respondent Nos. 3 to 7 are different statutory authorities exercising statutory functions. Respondent No. 8 is a Company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 which carries on the business of storage and handling of various chemicals. R
Vincent Panikurlangara v. Union of India
Dahanu Taluka Environment Protection Group v. Bombay Suburban Electricity Supply Company Ltd.
Sachidanand Pandey v. State of W.B.
Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. v. Union of India
Anirudhsingh Karansinghji Jadeja v. State of Gujarat
Bombay Environmental Action Group v. The Bombay Municipal Corporation
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.