R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR
Mapusa Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. . – Appellant
Versus
Dattatraya A. P Mahambre and others – Respondent
2.The grievance of the appellant is that the impugned order has been passed by misconstruing the provisions contained in section 34 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, as applied to the State of Goa and hereinafter called the "said Act". It is the contention of the appellant that upon proper construction of the said section 34 of the said Act, the dues to the appellant ought to rank higher than that of the respondents.
3.The facts which are not in dispute are
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.