JUDGMENT -T.K. CHANDRASHEKHARA DAS, J.:---This Chamber Summons is taken out by the defendant No. 8 in Suit No 2231 of 1999. The said suit came to be filed by the plaintiffs for mainly challenging the order passed by the defendant No. 1 State of Maharashtra that threatened to cancel the lease in favour of the plaintiff as per the orders dated 22-9-1999 and 10-3-1999 passed by the third respondent, Collector of Bombay City annexed to the plaint as Exh. U V respectively. The suit has been disposed of by this Court by order dated 6th September, 1999 passed by my learned brother H.L. Gokhale, J. The said order amplifies that dispute cropped up therein were among three parties unlike in normal suit. Paragraph 4 of the order makes it amply clear this peculiar aspect of the case, which reads as under :

"The defendant No. 4 and its representatives had earlier agreed to vacate the concerned premises but in view of further life give to them by the defendant No. 1 in their orders, the present suit became necessary. The learned Counsel on all the three sides have made their best efforts to see to it that the controversy is resolved amicably and have arrived at the Consent terms which are bein

Click Here to Read the rest of this document