SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Bom) 250

S.RADHAKRISHNAN, B.N.SRIKRISHNA
Gajanan Chandrarao Sawant – Appellant
Versus
Chandrabhaga Chandrarao Sawant and others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - B.N. SRIKRISHNA, J.:---These two appeals arise out of the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated March 1/2, 1996 made commonly in the two suits i.e. Testamentary Suit No. 36/1984 and Testamentary Suit No. 21/1992.

2.After having heard the Counsel appearing on both sides quite extensively, we are satisfied that the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge appealed against would have to be set aside and the two suits sent back and the parties be given opportunity of leading further evidence for the reasons which we shall indicate hereinafter.

Facts:

3.Mrs. Chandrabhaga Chandrarao Sawant filed Testamentary Petition No. 449 of 1984 seeking letters of administration in respect of the Will of deceased Chandrarao Suryaji Sawant dated 11th February, 1966. Upon the Caveators objecting to it, this Testamentary Petition No. 449/1984 was converted into Testamentary Suit No. 36/1984. Simultaneously, Gajanan Chandrarao Sawant filed a Testamentary petition Propounding the Will of the deceased Chandrarao Suryaji Sawant. Upon this Testamentary petition being objected to, it was converted into the Testamentary Suit No. 21/1992. As both these suits raised common issues, th



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top